Reflection for North Balwyn Uniting Church
2nd of July, 2023
Genesis 22:1-14
What on earth can we do with today’s reading from the Book of Genesis, the binding of Isaac? The Revised Common Lectionary, which leaves out other stories in Genesis like the rape of Dinah and the revenge taken by her brothers (Genesis 34:1-31), the attempt by the men of Sodom to rape two of God’s messengers (Genesis 19:1-11), and the incest between a drunken Lot and his two daughters that was the origin of the people of Moab and Ammon (Genesis 19:30-38), includes this passage of attempted child sacrifice for our instruction. The Bible has many stories that are distinctly unedifying, I am completely unsurprised that a parent tried to get it banned from a school in Utah as unsuitable for children, but the lectionary passes over most of them in silence, and we never hear them read out in church. Why is this story part of the lectionary? I would argue that child murder, even when prevented at the last minute, is at least as abhorrent as rape and incest. There is little on which I agree with celebrity atheist Richard Dawkins, but I do mostly agree with his comment in The God Delusion that: ‘this disgraceful story is an example simultaneously of child abuse, bullying in two asymmetrical power relationships, and the first recorded use of the Nuremberg defence: “I was only obeying orders”. Yet the legend is one of the great foundational myths of all three monotheistic religions.’ Where I differ from Dawkins is on the latter point. He suggests that Jews, Christians, and Muslims blithely read this story as foundational, thus accepting child abuse, bullying, and blind obedience as part of our faith. The absolute opposite is true. Continue reading